Huge setback for Uddhav Thackeray camp in 'REAL Shiv Sena' case, SC says THIS

New Delhi: In a huge setback to the Uddhav Thackeray camp, the Supreme Court after a day-long hearing on Tuesday declined to stop the Election Commission from deciding the legitimacy of the Eknath Shinde faction’s claim to be the “real Shiv Sena.” A five-judge constitution bench, headed by Justice DY Chandrachud, said there will be no stay on proceedings before the EC to decide the intra-party dispute in Shiv Sena between Uddhav Thackeray and the faction led by chief minister Eknath Shinde, on which one is the original party and also on getting the party symbol.

 

Supreme Court declines to stay the proceedings before the Election Commission of India on Shinde group's claim for recognition as 'real' Shiv Sena.

Court rejects plea of Uddhav Thackeray group seeking stay on proceedings before the Election Commission. — ANI (@ANI) September 27, 2022

 

The bench - also comprising Justices M R Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli, and P S Narasimha -- declined to entertain a plea by the Thackeray faction that EC should not be allowed to proceed in the matter till the apex court decides the plea pertaining to disqualification of Shiv Sena MLAs.

"We direct that there would be no stay of the proceedings before the Election Commission of India," the five-judge constitution bench said.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the Thackeray faction, submitted before the bench that Shinde cannot move the EC, once he has incurred disqualification. Justice Chandrachud noted that the mere fact a reference has been made does not stall a constitutional body from deciding if it has the power to decide under the law.

 

We respect the Supreme Court's decision. It has said EC can give its decision...It's not a question of setback: Arvind Sawant, Shiv Sena MP (Thackeray faction)

As for disqualification, the case will continue in Supreme Court, he adds. pic.twitter.com/MSoUnoeSDP — ANI (@ANI) September 27, 2022

 

The bench noted that Thackeray`s faction contended that the proceedings before the EC is the offshoot of the petitions before it and so it should not go on. Sibal argued that Shinde wants to go to the EC and say that his faction is the political party, but much before that his membership to the party is in question in these proceedings, which have to be decided first.

The Thackeray faction moved the apex court seeking a stay on EC`s proceedings on Eknath Shinde-faction`s plea for recognition as areal` Shiv Sena.

During the hearing, the bench noted that the political party is a much wider configuration than the legislative unit of that party which consists of the elected members. It further queried if the dispute in relation to the former in the legislative unit affects the authority of the EC. The apex court heard arguments from the lawyers of both factions, and also the submission of counsel of the EC.

(With Agency Inputs)