'Freebies' during poll campaigns: DMK approaches Supreme Court, pleads 'Welfare schemes secure economic justice...'

New Delhi: After Aam Aadmi Party's petition, Tamil Nadu`s ruling DMK has also moved an impleadment motion notice before Supreme Court, asking to be made a respondent to a plea seeking that political parties be prohibited from promising "freebies" during elections campaigns. In its application, the DMK said, "It is humbly submitted that the scope of a `freebie` is very wide and there are a lot of aspects which are to be considered. Only a welfare scheme introduced by a state government cannot be judged to be classified as a freebie."

"The ruling government at the Union giving tax holidays to foreign companies, waiver of bad loans of influential industrialists, granting crucial contracts to favoured conglomerates etc., also have to be considered and cannot be left untouched," IANS quoted the DMK as stating. It further argued that the top court cannot have a restrictive approach for classifying any scheme or act by the Union/state legislature to be a "freebie" without considering the magnitude of resultant consequences and social welfare at both micro and macro level.

Also read: Freebies row: Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal is a BIG liar, what has he….., asks BJP

The DMK submitted that a welfare scheme providing a free service is introduced with an intent to secure a social order and economic justice under Article 38 to minimise the inequalities in income, status, facilities and opportunities and in no imaginable reality, it could be construed as a "freebie".

Also read: BJP launches scathing attack on Arvind Kejriwal over freebies remark

According to the DMK's application, "Such schemes have been introduced in order to provide basic necessities which the poor households cannot afford. They cannot be imputed to be luxuries. Schemes such as free electricity can have a multi-dimensional effect on a poor household. Electricity can provide lighting, heating and cooling resulting in a better standard of living. It can facilitate a child in his education and studies."

It further submitted that a welfare scheme, therefore, can have a wide reach and multiple intentions behind its introduction and the cascading effect arising from it cannot be defined in a restrictive meaning as a freebie, adding "The Constitution empowers the state governments under the Concurrent and State Lists to promulgate welfare schemes. Therefore, the term `freebies` cannot be interpreted in such a way which interferes with the State`s competence under the Schedule VII."

(With IANS Inputs)